HOLIDAY BREAK: The ChAD offices will be closed from December 25, 2023 to January 2, 2024.

Emergency assistance for technical issues related to the ChAD Portal (including ÉduChAD) will be available on December 27, 28 and 29 and January 2, 2024 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

During this period, you can contact SVI Solutions at 1-866-843-4848 #1 or for the following problems:

  • Problem logging in to the ChAD Portal (which includes ÉduChAD).
  • Technical problem viewing and completing a training course.

To know more (in french only).


Sorry, but nothing corresponds your search criteria. Try again with different keywords.

Go to content

Construction defects: Property damage? Accident?

Publication date: November 30, 2010 | Last update: April 27, 2020

This summary does not constitute a legal opinion. The information it contains may not reflect the current state of the law.

The context
The Supreme Court looked at an insurer’s duty to defend its client, a general contractor that had built four buildings and was being sued by the owner for construction defects.

The owner of the buildings was alleging construction defects in the building shell, which supposedly caused major damage due to water infiltration.

Progressive, whose liability insurer, Lombard, had denied it coverage on the ground that this was not a claim for property damage due to an occurrence or an accident under the terms of the policy, had applied to the courts for a declaration that its insurer owed it a duty to defend.

The lower courts of British Columbia held that the insurer did not have a duty to defend its insured. The Supreme Court overturned those judgments.